Dependency

- Actually removed `static DNode[] poes`
- Actually added some todos

TypeChecker

- Actually removed any references to `DNode.poes`

source/tlang/compiler/typecheck/core.d

@@ -110,10 +110,6 @@ public final class TypeChecker
         codeQueue.clear();
         assert(codeQueue.empty() == true);
 
-        //FIXME: Look at this, ffs why is it static
-        //Clear tree/linearized version (todo comment)
-        DNode.poes=[];
-
         /* Grab functionData ??? */
         FunctionData[string] functionDefinitions = grabFunctionDefs();
         gprintln("Defined functions: "~to!(string)(functionDefinitions));
@@ -165,9 +161,6 @@ public final class TypeChecker
             }
             codeQueue.clear();
 
-            // Clear the linearization for the next round
-            DNode.poes=[];
-
             gprintln("FUNCDEF DONE: "~to!(string)(functionBodyCodeQueues[funcData.name]));
         }
 

source/tlang/compiler/typecheck/dependency/core.d

@@ -162,11 +162,6 @@ public class DNode
     private bool complete;
     private DNode[] dependencies;
 
-
-    //TODO: Commen this
-    //NOTE: This is the linearized version
-    public static DNode[] poes;
-
     this(DNodeGenerator dnodegen, Statement entity)
     {
         this.entity = entity;
@@ -327,7 +322,7 @@ public class DNode
          /* TODO: I think using `isDone` we can linearise */
         gprintln("Done/Not-done?: "~to!(string)(isDone));
 
-        // TODO: What is this for and do we even need it? See issue #41
+        // TODO: What is this for and do we even need it? See issue #41 Problem 5
         if(isDone)
         {
             destinationLinearList ~= this;
@@ -337,7 +332,7 @@ public class DNode
         return tree;
     }
 
-    // TODO: What is this for and do we even need it? See issue #41
+    // TODO: What is this for and do we even need it? See issue #41 Problem 5
     private bool isDone()
     {
         bool done = false;