Annotations support #91

New Issue

deavmi · 2023-01-20T20:12:37Z

deavmi commented

2023-01-20 20:12:37 +00:00

What is this?

TODO: The following:

Add a specification for what annotations should look like,
What they should be able to control - can probably be extended
Add some basic built-in ones
Add support for them to the parser
- We will want something like an annotation forward check - for existence, if non existent, then prevTOken back and return null, else return the instance of the annotation
- We will want to attach annotations to Statement objects

### What is this? TODO: The following: 1. Add a specification for what annotations should look like, 2. What they should be able to control - can probably be extended 3. Add some basic built-in ones 4. Add support for them to the parser * We will want something like an annotation forward check - for existence, if non existent, then prevTOken back and return `null`, else return the instance of the annotation * We will want to attach annotations to `Statement` objects

deavmi added a new dependency 2023-01-22 13:22:22 +00:00

#92 Compilation arguments

deavmi removed a dependency 2023-01-22 13:22:25 +00:00

#92 Compilation arguments

deavmi commented

2023-04-25 10:25:50 +01:00

I think we can easily implement both the declaration of user-defined annotations and the annotation decorators easily.

The latter we use a stack of string name references each time we see it. Then any entity which can accept an annotation - when being parsed - can check if the stack is empty, if not, pop off, and attach.

Then in meta-processor we process them (look them up by their name).

These are just rough ideas but I think this could work.

I think we can easily implement both the declaration of user-defined annotations and the annotation decorators easily. The latter we use a stack of string name references each time we see it. Then any entity which can accept an annotation - when being parsed - can check if the stack is empty, if not, pop off, and attach. Then in meta-processor we process them (look them up by their name). --- These are just rough ideas but I think this could work.

deavmi commented

2023-08-27 12:11:40 +01:00

Closing this for now due to #156 being the new issue for tracking this

deavmi closed this issue

2023-08-27 12:11:42 +01:00

Sign in to join this conversation.

No Label